After the Utah Supreme Court’s July 2024 ruling on citizen initiatives and redistricting, LWV Utah filed a supplemental complaint and motion for a preliminary injunction to keep Amendment D off the November 2024 ballot. Amendment D would have effectively eliminated the right of voters to reform their government with ballot initiatives by allowing the Legislature to overturn and modify initiatives after they passed. Plaintiffs asserted the summary used to describe the amendment and the failure by the Legislature to strictly comply with the prescribed procedures on placing amendments on the ballot were illegal under the state constitution.

LWV Arizona filed an amicus brief in state court opposing an emergency petition for special action to limit nearly 100,000 Arizona voters from voting a “full ballot” due to a clerical error surrounding proof of citizenship. The brief supported Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes’ decision to allow the voters a “full ballot” for the November 2024 election.

LWV Arizona, LWVUS, the Secure Families Initiative, and Modern Military Association of America filed an amicus brief in a federal lawsuit defending the applicability of the NVRA to presidential elections. The Arizona Legislature had enacted H.B. 2492, which required proof of citizenship to vote in presidential elections and to vote early by mail. After these provisions were enjoined by the District Court, the defendants appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing the NVRA did not apply to presidential elections.

The Alabama Coalition for Immigrant Justice; League of Women Voters of Alabama; and Alabama State Conference of the NAACP filed a federal lawsuit seeking to stop a new voter purge program implemented by the Alabama Secretary of State before the 2024 election. The program had flagged over 3,000 registered voters for having been issued non-citizen identification numbers, even if they had been naturalized, and also US-born voters, for removal from the voter rolls.