Celina Stewart is the chief executive officer of the League of Women Voters of the United States. She leads the century-strong voting rights organization in its mission to empower voters and defend democracy. She oversees the League’s operations, resources, and strategy in this defining moment for American democracy.
Appointed CEO just three months before the 2024 election, Celina guided the organization through one of the most consequential election cycles in modern history. Under her first year of leadership, the League reached more than 30 million voters and invested over $1 million in nonpartisan election education. She unveiled a bold vision at the 2024 National LWV Convention, outlining goals to strengthen the League’s leadership in voting rights, align its national network of 700+ affiliates, and grow its membership and financial capacity through an equity-centered transformation.
Celina also launched Unite and Rise 8.5, an ambitious campaign to mobilize 8.5 million voters and assert the League’s role as a backbone organization for nonviolent civic action and defense of democracy. Her leadership emphasizes racial equity, organizational culture, and the need to modernize civic engagement for the current era.
Celina joined the League in 2018 as director of advocacy and litigation. In that role — and later as senior director and chief counsel — she developed a nationally recognized legal advocacy program. She was the architect of the “People Powered Fair Maps™” redistricting campaign and One Person One Vote, a long-term campaign to end the Electoral College. Her work expanded the League’s presence on Capitol Hill and built key legal partnerships nationwide.
A creative legal strategist, Celina has led litigation to protect voters from intimidation and disinformation. In League of Women Voters Arizona v. Lions of Liberty, she secured a restraining order against militia groups threatening voters at drop boxes, setting a national precedent. In League of Women Voters of New Hampshire v. Kramer, she combined voting rights and consumer protection law to address AI-generated robocalls designed to suppress voters in the 2024 primary. The case established a novel legal framework for protecting elections from disinformation.
Celina is a frequent media voice on democracy and voting rights. She has appeared on CBS News Sunday Morning, MSNBC Morning Joe, CNN, TIME, The Washington Post, Vogue, Teen Vogue, The New York Times, Newsweek, Spectrum News, and Roland Martin, Unfiltered, among others. She has spoken at Harvard, Georgetown Law, American University, Hampton University, and Northeastern Law. In May 2025, she testified before the US Senate, warning lawmakers that legislation like the SAVE Act could disproportionately suppress eligible voters — especially women and people of color — and urging protection for free and fair elections.
Before joining the League, Celina served as chief operating officer and director of philanthropy at FairVote, where she advanced structural election reform and organizational growth. She has also worked as a litigation consultant to Am Law 100 firms, a legislative aide in the Michigan Legislature, and as legal counsel to Georgia House Minority Leader Stacey Abrams, where she led redistricting work in compliance with the Voting Rights Act. She also served as executive director of the Congressional Black Caucus Institute’s 21st Century Council, helping shape national policy recommendations for communities of color.
Celina earned her JD from Western Michigan University Law School and her BA in Sociology from Spelman College. She is licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia and has served on the boards of the DC Bar Association, the Women’s Bar Association of DC, and the NAACP DC Branch. She is a member of the National Task Force on Election Crises and is active in the national civil rights coalition defending democracy.
Beyond her professional work, Celina is a published author (The Pocket Planner), a wine enthusiast, and a passionate foodie.
Photo: DFinney Photography
After the Supreme Court's decision in the Rucho case this past June, "failing to take a stand for voters and...limit...partisan gerrymandering," we promised to fight harder than ever.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was one of the most important pieces of legislation of the 20th century. But in 2013, the Supreme Court gutted important sections of it in Shelby County v. Holder.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Department of Commerce v. New York, a case challenging the Administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census short form. Learn more about the case here.
On March 26, the U.S. Supreme Court heard three high-profile cases pertaining to gerrymandering, including Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina.
The LWVNC v. Rucho case is a partisan gerrymandering challenge to the North Carolina congressional map. Partisan gerrymandering is the practice of drawing electoral district lines in a way that discriminates against a political party.
Congress could make history with HR1, a comprehensive package of democracy reforms. We have been working to ensure that it strengthens voting rights.
After three days of hearings, this is what we’ve learned about Judge Kavanaugh’s record as it relates to our priority issues.
Shelby County v. Holder was a landmark case addressing the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Here's what's happened in the five years since the case was decided.
It is up to Congress to exercise oversight authority over the Census Bureau and remove the citizenship question from the 2020 Census.